I've been wrestling with God much more in my mind than in my heart for the past couple of months. While the intellectual struggles have been great, it's almost as if I've voluntarily withdrawn and decided that the heart isn't always quite worth it, as if investing in outpourings of the heart is mutually exclusive from challenging my mind to the utmost. I know that such isn't true, but I'm finding it difficult to strike the right balance in real life, given our human limitations of time, willpower, and energy. Given my confusion and internal qualms, I am all the more excited to read John Piper and colleagues' "Thinking. Loving.Doing.: A Call to Glorify God with Heart and Mind." over the next few days. I am thankful for Thanksgiving break.
Another set of tensions that has been on my mind stems from attending the Ames moot court last week:
Law: While law is supposed to render people equal, the process seems very hierarchical and full of deference. Lawyers -- or at least the law students who argued in front of Justice Sotomayor and the other two justices -- seem to have little confidence in themselves. The people who argued were also poor in answering directly the questions posed to them. Sometimes they would evade the question, making round-about arguments. Or, they would try to prove that whatever they had said before was legitimate and advanced their case -- generally not a bad thing, but in this case the tactic was inappropriate and poorly timed, because the students had been asked just to answer certain yes-or-no questions. When asked for certain information, give it. Don't beat about the bush.
Business: I've heard that businesses and corporations are often hierarchical, but increasingly I've found that one can achieve respect as long as you prove your arguments with substantial, meaningful evidence. Granted, it's not always easy to put yourself in a position where you can prove your point, but after doing so, opportunities (can) come in a much more meritocratic way...
- - -
have you ever dreamt voices?
can i bottle up your voice,
and set it within a clear glass vial
to radiate colors of crystal
while stopped with a piece of cork
sealed tight?
a deceptively cool-headed wind
whooshes
past
the crevices of your being
brood burgundy
as autumn souls
are caressed in warm argent
will you not also reach for the light?
-eHc
Another set of tensions that has been on my mind stems from attending the Ames moot court last week:
Law: While law is supposed to render people equal, the process seems very hierarchical and full of deference. Lawyers -- or at least the law students who argued in front of Justice Sotomayor and the other two justices -- seem to have little confidence in themselves. The people who argued were also poor in answering directly the questions posed to them. Sometimes they would evade the question, making round-about arguments. Or, they would try to prove that whatever they had said before was legitimate and advanced their case -- generally not a bad thing, but in this case the tactic was inappropriate and poorly timed, because the students had been asked just to answer certain yes-or-no questions. When asked for certain information, give it. Don't beat about the bush.
Business: I've heard that businesses and corporations are often hierarchical, but increasingly I've found that one can achieve respect as long as you prove your arguments with substantial, meaningful evidence. Granted, it's not always easy to put yourself in a position where you can prove your point, but after doing so, opportunities (can) come in a much more meritocratic way...
- - -
have you ever dreamt voices?
can i bottle up your voice,
and set it within a clear glass vial
to radiate colors of crystal
while stopped with a piece of cork
sealed tight?
a deceptively cool-headed wind
whooshes
past
the crevices of your being
brood burgundy
as autumn souls
are caressed in warm argent
will you not also reach for the light?
-eHc















